Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLong, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPfaffhuber, Andreas Aspmo
dc.contributor.authorBazin, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKåsin, Kristoffer
dc.contributor.authorGylland, Anders Samstad
dc.contributor.authorMontaflia, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-13T12:09:45Z
dc.date.available2018-02-13T12:09:45Z
dc.date.created2017-12-06T14:40:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationQuarterly journal of engineering geology and hydrogeology. 2017, .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1470-9236
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2484369
dc.description.abstractIn geotechnical engineering in Norway, Sweden and Canada the presence of sensitive and/or quick clays poses a major challenge. Formation of these clays involves the leaching of salt from the pore fluid. Thus it has been recognized that electrical resistivity measurements could be useful in delineating leached and unleached clays. This paper seeks to assess the applicability, repeatability and reliability of the various geophysical techniques in the study of sensitive clays. It also attempts to understand the factors that control the measured resistivity and in particular to determine the limitations of directly obtaining the remoulded shear strength from the resistivity measurements. It was found that borehole, surface and airborne resistivity measurements are accurate and compatible. For the 30 Norwegian sites studied it was found that resistivity is primarily defined by the porewater salt content, with minor additional influence by clay content and plasticity, and porosity. A relationship exists between resistivity and remoulded shear strength but this is limited to material deeper than the dry crust and a surface weathering zone of about 7.5 m thickness. High resistivity (>10 Ω m) may indicate quick or weathered clay but low resistivity (<10 Ω m) conclusively points to stable, unleached clay.
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.titleGlacio-marine clay resistivity as a proxy for remoulded shear strength: correlations and limitationsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber16nb_NO
dc.source.journalQuarterly journal of engineering geology and hydrogeologynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1144/qjegh2016-136
dc.identifier.cristin1523659
cristin.unitcode7452,3,2,0
cristin.unitcode7452,2,2,0
cristin.unitnameGeokartlegging
cristin.unitnameFeltundersøkelser
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel