dc.contributor.author | Harbitz, Carl Bonnevie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-15T09:46:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-15T09:46:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3096579 | |
dc.description | In Proceedings of Mountainous Natural Hazards: International conference on mountainous natural hazards, Genoble 12-14 April, 1999 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | An examination of existing models shows that: (1) there is not - and probably never will be - a single model that adequately describes all avalanche types; (2) in order to account for the extraordinary variability of avalanche motion in response to initial and boundary conditions, flow-regime transitions and the snow mass balance should be properly described in future models; (3) calibration and validation of these models will require a comprehensive measurement programme, (4) determination of realistic initial conditions is a serious problem. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.subject | Avalanche-RnD | en_US |
dc.subject | Snøskred-FoU | en_US |
dc.title | Conclusions on the current status on avalanche modelling | en_US |
dc.type | Chapter | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 283-284 | en_US |